Certificate Authorities

ZeroSSL vs Let's Encrypt: Choosing the Right Free CA for Your Organization

A comprehensive comparison of ZeroSSL and Let's Encrypt for enterprise SSL certificate management, including features, rate limits, and automation options.

A
Alex Chen
Security Engineer
2026-01-08
11 min read

The Rise of Free SSL Certificates

Free SSL certificates have transformed web security, making HTTPS accessible to everyone. Two major providers dominate this space: Let's Encrypt (the pioneer) and ZeroSSL (the challenger). Understanding their differences helps organizations make informed decisions.

Provider Overview

Let's Encrypt

  • Launched: 2015
  • Operated By: Internet Security Research Group (ISRF)
  • Non-profit: Yes
  • Focus: Universal HTTPS adoption

ZeroSSL

  • Launched: 2016 (ACME support 2020)
  • Operated By: Apilayer (Stack Holdings)
  • For-profit: Yes (with free tier)
  • Focus: User-friendly SSL with premium options

Feature Comparison

FeatureLet's EncryptZeroSSL
Free CertificatesUnlimited3/month (free)
Certificate Validity90 days90-365 days
Wildcard SupportYes (DNS-01)Yes (paid plans)
Multi-Domain (SAN)100 names100 names
ACME ProtocolYesYes
REST APINoYes
Web DashboardNoYes
EAB RequiredNoYes
Rate LimitsStrictFlexible (paid)
Paid OptionsNoYes

ACME Protocol Support

Let's Encrypt ACME

Standard ACME v2 without external account binding - just configure directory URL and email.

ZeroSSL ACME

Requires External Account Binding (EAB) - configure directory URL, email, and EAB credentials (kid and hmac_key).

Rate Limits

Let's Encrypt Limits

  • 50 certificates per registered domain per week
  • 5 duplicate certificates per week
  • 5 failed validations per hour per account
  • 300 pending authorizations per account
  • 100 names per certificate

ZeroSSL Limits

Free tier:

  • 3 certificates per month

Paid plans:

  • Unlimited certificates
  • Higher API rate limits
  • Priority support

REST API Comparison

ZeroSSL REST API Advantage

ZeroSSL provides a REST API alongside ACME for simpler automation without an ACME client.

Benefits:

  • Simpler for basic automation
  • No ACME client required
  • Direct certificate status queries
  • Easier integration for some use cases

Let's Encrypt ACME Only

Let's Encrypt requires ACME protocol and a compatible client like certbot.

Use Case Recommendations

Choose Let's Encrypt When:

  • Unlimited free certificates needed
  • Existing ACME automation in place
  • Community support preferred
  • Non-profit mission alignment important
  • Standard 90-day renewal acceptable

Choose ZeroSSL When:

  • REST API preferred over ACME
  • Web dashboard management desired
  • Higher rate limits needed (paid)
  • Longer validity periods required (paid)
  • Wildcard certificates without DNS-01 needed (paid)

Hybrid Strategy

Many enterprises use both providers:

  • Let's Encrypt: Internal services, development, staging
  • ZeroSSL: Production backup, rate limit overflow, REST API integrations

Migration Considerations

From Let's Encrypt to ZeroSSL

  1. Generate ZeroSSL API key
  2. Obtain EAB credentials
  3. Update ACME client configuration
  4. Test with staging/free tier
  5. Migrate gradually by domain

From ZeroSSL to Let's Encrypt

  1. Update ACME directory URL
  2. Remove EAB credentials
  3. Consider rate limit impact
  4. Test renewal workflow
  5. Update monitoring

Conclusion

Both Let's Encrypt and ZeroSSL provide excellent free SSL options. Let's Encrypt offers unlimited free certificates with ACME, while ZeroSSL adds REST API flexibility and paid tiers for enhanced limits. Many organizations benefit from using both providers in a hybrid strategy.

TOPICS

zerossl
lets encrypt
free ssl
acme protocol
ssl comparison

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Ready to Transform Your Certificate Management?

See how TigerTrust can help you automate certificate lifecycle management at scale.